It has come to my attention that my memory often fails me, even for the things I can be most fascinated by and which I wish to remember most. So I have decided to write about the books, stories, ideas and art which inspire me–– what I think about them, what I have learnt, because I think this way I will remember more, and even if I do forget, it's never really too far away to get back :)
So today I went for an art exhibition on Minimalism. Honestly one of the more interesting, confusing and mentally exhausting exhibitions I have gone to, which perhaps backs the whole point of it; The lack of in space, colour, shape... does not necessarily mean that there is less to consider.
There are some overarching concepts when it comes to Minimalism; the use of and interaction with space is one. I gathered that a lot of thought goes into the positioning of an object or any 'thing', and there is great intentionality in pushing the viewer to consider the object in relation to the space around it. So if I were to frame some guiding questions I believe would be in line with Minimalism and space, perhaps they would include "Why is the object placed in this way? Why this orientation? Why in this setting? Does the environment add more value to the object and/or the other way round?" and maybe even "What fills in the space? Is there emptiness?"
This idea pertains to one of the main sections that we came across that was about The Void. Artists concerned with this concept of nothingness try to provide experiences or an avenue to contemplate such ineffability. It kind of makes sense now, all the different mediums that we came across in the exhibition. There was light and sound works involved, and as I was writing the earlier paragraph I had difficulty finding a definitive and encompassing term for these mediums (I thought "matter" might do the trick, but Google suggested neither light nor sound were matter, and in the most realistic primary school level science view, they didn't have weight and didn't take up space.) It is perhaps inevitable that when engaging with the idea of space, and when dealing with the 'empty' spaces so characteristic of Minimalistic art, a contemplation of absence, infinitude and their meaning will soon follow. And maybe the use of light and sound, in all their intangibility and subjectivity, is a reflection of this curiosity and attempt to discover The Void.
While it may seem contradictory, Minimalism is also concerned with the idea of temporality, transience. There were works of images with things like the mist of hot water from a kettle, a long road-looking strip that stops short and which you cannot see the other end of (by Tan Ping). One of Lea and my favourites was a video footage of the painting of the ensõ circle on a block of ice, and its washing away ("Circle" by Charwei Tsai). It is looped so it looks like it occurs endlessly and seamlessly. It was captivating... The idea of transience, I think, is another form of emptiness, another subset of The Void. That one cannot hold on to it and preserve it forever, it is another way of questioning what is. I guess it echoes a lot about ontology.
There was also a lot on circles; the cycles of life, circular and round movement. This I saw in the movement pieces in the videos which was really interesting. Minimalism reached even the art of movement, such as how minimalist artists like Anna Halprin was known for stripping dance down to the essentials, being rid of the conventions and the rules, and focusing on everyday and natural movements. This was especially in contrast to the conventional dance of that time, epitomised by the teachings of Martha Graham (whom we learnt about briefly in TSD), which was more complex. Upon viewing the videos, my thoughts led me to the concept of Grotowski's Poor Theatre in the sense of stripping down and even adopting primal behaviour as part of the rehearsal process (as I tried in a workshop). In these movement pieces was also a lot of repetition, which was probably present in all forms (the visual art, music), and is also another characteristic of a lot of Minimalistic art. It emphasised a certain cyclical nature, and reminded me also of some of Stanislavski's teachings, more specifically the practice of repeating movements to elicit a psychological response. His concepts are also echoed by Halprin in a video I found online where she says "there's two ways of working with the body–– one where the mind informs the body, the other when the body itself informs the mind. Your body impulses guide you".
These ideas related to the use of space as well as Minimalism in movement really enthralled me because of how familiar I found them to what I have learnt in Theatre. Art really is all connected :)
xx,
CLL